.
Now Viewing: All| All
home help
An energy blog discussing the energy crisis in the USA. Please limit your comments and suggestions to subjects directly related to ENERGY issues-- conventional and-or renewable. This may include the politics and economics surrounding this critical problem. This is NOT a "global warming" subject blog --- except where government energy policies may coincide with GW economic concerns. Your comments-RANTS-or discussion is welcomed.

Latest Posts

Archive for June, 2009

This story hits really close to home. My daughter is one of the petroleum engineers on the new HOT ROCK geothermal energy project mentioned in this New York Times article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/business/energy-environment/24geotherm.html

Here is my daughter's comment on the very biased and unscientific New York Times article.

Comment below by Laura Nofziger- petroleum engineer for ALtaRock Energy:

"See link above to the NY Times article on AltaRock's project in northern
CA....fear mongering at its worse. 

This is the type of article you get when you send a standard reporter to do the work of a scientific reporter.  He doesn't interview any rock mechanics experts or seismologists for the article....just the local public. 

He also doesn't mention how the Geysers area is already critically stressed and had a bunch of seismic activity before the steam plants were installed. Plus, he focuses on Basel...the only EGS project to be shut down because of seismic activity. 

What about the successful projects in England, France
and the current work in Australia??? We're also talking about seismic
events on the order of 3.0 and smaller.  The vast majority of the events
are below 1.0.....you can't even feel these things.  They cause
absolutely no damage and no interruption to human life. 

Unbelievably sensationalist article...I hate the media."

Laura

 

What really disturbs me is the lack of good reporting by one of America's largest and best known newspapers-- "the newspaper of record" - so they say. Hot Rock geothermal is just about the cleanest and most environmentally friendly power source available. 

Or is the actual agenda of the newspaper to prevent any and all additional energy sources, regardless of the technology and regardless of how green it might be? This along with preventing solar power development in the Mohave Desert -- the perfect place for solar energy -  shows the REAL agenda of the environmental lobby. Namely, to prevent any and all development of new clean energy sources.

I hope I am mistaken, but I have the feeling I just might be correct.

http://www.altarockenergy.com/    AltaRock geothermal home page

 

and their media press release RESPONSE to the New York Times article.

http://www.altarockenergy.com/nyt.html

 

Joe Lalumia

Rockwall, Texas

(more)
Posted by boatman1 on Jun 24, 2009 11:55 AM

Most Recent Comments

Greed and motivation for profit (at the expense of innovation) continue to be the norm...4-5...
I really do not know HOW our children will pay for this massive deficit spending? As soon as...
In my old brain I completely forgot to add the FICA payments for our employees at the 2nd...
Aussie-- it's a fools game. The Soviets tried this to the extreme already- it failed; and the...
One more thing. This is probably the best quote of the year. I have lost half my net worth, and...

Privacy | Terms of Service | Feedback | contact us | faq | about this site | advertising © 2009 The Dallas Morning News, Inc., subsidiary of A.H. Belo Corp. All Rights Reserved.